
Aware of the seriousness of the matter facing Omar Bravo, the defense lawyer of the former player of ChivasDeportivo La CoruñaAtlas, Blue Cross and UdeG, Leonardo Treviño, explained that his client will be able to walk out due to the weakness of the evidence that made up the authorities.
He even raised the possibility of adhering to the abbreviated informal process, which would generate an agreement to repair damage to the victim, but really the defender of the one born in Sinaloa, highlighted that the Public Ministry He had to review filed complaints because there was not enough support in his evidence.
In the first instance, he said for the chain Image Televisionhe Mr. Trevino stated that: “It is a matter that merits, and may even lead to something known in law as a conditional suspension of the process, an abbreviated, early termination of the process that would generate an agreement.” of reparation for the damage to the victim.”
Treviño also showed respect for the victim and his family, taking into account the seriousness of the facts that his client is accused of: “I also want to take this opportunity to express all my respect to the victim and the family, which is the mother.”
However, the legal specialist highlighted that: “I believe that in this case they are treating him as guilty when he also has the burden of proof to prove that he is innocent.”
The lawyer’s presentation
The lawyer who heads Bravo’s defense assured in an interview for newspaper El País, not having more information about the accusations, but highlighted as important information that it is not possible that suddenly cases that remained archived, It is because the Public Ministry did not find evidence enough against your client.
“It is not possible that they have I dug into the old folders. There has to be a rationale and motivation to do that” and that to reopen a folder there must be new evidence: “It is not so easy to revive a case just out of interest or curiosity,” he said.
Treviño also acknowledged that child sexual abuse is a serious crime, but at the same time he highlighted that Bravo is accused of touching without copulation, something that “changes the situation a lot” and explained that with said accusation the maximum sentence he could face three years in prison as he has no criminal record.
Appearance tests
Treviño highlighted that the evidence handled by the accusing party is: “It only gives appearance,” so if it is consistent: “In my opinion, they are not well built. If only part of a video is shown and the context is omitted, or messages are cut off in a chat, you lose information that could benefit my client,” he says.
The truth is that Omar Bravo He is accused of aggravated child sexual abuse: the victim was under 12 years old when the attacks began, they lived under the same roof, emotional ties, position of trust/authority, for being the mother’s partner and psychological violence.
Pere reverted in the sense that:“The matter will not go that far,” as well as the fact that the former player is aware of the seriousness of the matter, as well as that he is aware of the different legal scenarios that he must face, but at the same time he highlighted that Omar Bravo rejected: “The scope that they want to give it,” he concluded.
Continue reading: